<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dean Browski &#187; Better Decisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deanbrowski.com/category/well-being/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deanbrowski.com</link>
	<description>Sports Prognosticator, Commentator, &#38; Rennaisance Man</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:01:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2011 NFL Season Predictions</title>
		<link>http://deanbrowski.com/2011/09/08/2011-nfl-season-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://deanbrowski.com/2011/09/08/2011-nfl-season-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Better Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wagering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[better bettor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wagering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanbrowski.com/?p=3182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Open Your Account at WagerWeb Today! The Dean is taking it down to the wire in getting you predictions for the NFL season that kicks off tonight. You can all take a deep breath, Dean and his Scouts finally got together this past Sunday to perform the exercise of predicting how many wins each team [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></br></p>
<p align="center"><font size =3><a href="http://www.wagerweb.com/redir.php?PromoID=AF5379&#038;mediaTypeID=11&#038;url=http://www.wagerweb.com/">Open Your Account at WagerWeb Today!</a></font></p>
<p></br><img src="http://deanbrowski.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/atlanta-cheerleaders1-213x300.jpg" alt="Atlanta fans will have a lot to cheer about" title="atlanta falcons cheerleader" width="213" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-3192" /></p>
<p><font size =3>The Dean is taking it down to the wire in getting you predictions for the NFL season that kicks off tonight. You can all take a deep breath, Dean and his Scouts finally got together this past Sunday to perform the exercise of predicting how many wins each team will get this year, all playoff matchups, and finally a Super Bowl winner.</font></p>
<p><font size =3>Before the info is shared, let&#8217;s define how we arrived at our predictions.</font></p>
<p><font size =3>Dean is a firm believer that most bettors waste time by saturating themselves in data that does nothing but muddy the waters. Dean also attests to making fast decisions and trusting ones gut instincts. Being fast should not be confused with rushing. Lastly, we employed the wisdom of the crowd to arrive at the final predictions. The wisdom of the crowd says that the crowd is wiser than anyone one individual in the crowd.</font></p>
<p><font size =3>Here is the process we followed. The group sat down and spent no more than 10 minutes determining the win totals of a division. The first 5 minutes were spent in group discussion reviewing basic information: last year&#8217;s win totals, changes to rosters, etc. The second 5 minutes was for the individual to determine each team&#8217;s win totals. In most instances the full 5 minutes was not needed for the second part. During the individual period each person could look at information they felt was relevant. This could have included bye weeks, which other divisions were on that teams schedule, etc. When each person was ready, they would give their prediction of each team&#8217;s win totals. We did this division by division until all eight divisions were fully predicted.</font></p>
<p><font size =3>The average number of wins was then determined and the final standings were determined. We did not round off numbers, so if the Pittsburgh Steelers were predicted to have 11.25 wins and the Baltimore Ravens were predicted to have 11 wins, then the Steelers were the AFC North division winners. In the instance of any ties, we went through the normal tie breaking process. We first looked if those teams had any head to head matchups, and if so which team would have won that game. Once all ties were broken (there was only one) we had the playoff teams.</font></p>
<p><font size =3>Each playoff game was determined and we each gave our winner and predicted score. Whichever team had the majority of votes was declared the winner. Point totals were roughly averaged. We progressed through the playoffs and voila! we have our Super Bowl winner predicted as . . . </font></p>
<p><font size =3><b>AFC East</b></font><br />
<font size =3>New England Patriots 12.75</font> <i>(Dean 13, Bobby 13, TMech 13, Columbo 12)</i><br />
<font size =3>New York Jets 11</font> <i>(Dean 11, Bobby 11, TMech 12, Columbo 10)</i><br />
<font size =3>Buffalo Bills 5</font> <i>(Dean 5, Bobby 5, TMech 5, Columbo 5)</i><br />
<font size =3>Miami Dolphins 4.75</font> <i>(Dean 4, Bobby 4, TMech 5, Columbo 6)</i></p>
<p><font size =3><b>AFC South</b></font><br />
<font size =3>Indianapolis Colts 9</font> <i>(Dean 7, Bobby 10, TMech 9, Columbo 10)</i><br />
<font size =3>Jacksonville Jaguars 8.25</font> <i>(Dean 8, Bobby 8, TMech 9, Columbo 8 )</i><br />
<font size =3>Houston Texans 7.5</font> <i>(Dean 9, Bobby 9, TMech 6, Columbo 6)</i><br />
<font size =3>Tennessee Titans 6.25</font> <i>(Dean 7, Bobby 6, TMech 6, Columbo 6)</i></p>
<p><font size =3><b>AFC North</b></font><br />
<font size =3>Pittsburgh Steelers 12.25</font> <i>(Dean 11, Bobby 13, TMech 13, Columbo 12)</i><br />
<font size =3>Baltimore Ravens 11.25</font> <i>(Dean 11, Bobby 12, TMech 12, Columbo 10)</i><br />
<font size =3>Cleveland Browns 7.25</font> <i>(Dean 9, Bobby 8, TMech 7, Columbo 5)</i><br />
<font size =3>Cincinnati Bengals 4</font> <i>(Dean 4, Bobby 2, TMech 4, Columbo 6)</i></p>
<p><font size =3><b>AFC West</b></font><br />
<font size =3>San Diego Chargers 10</font> <i>(Dean 11, Bobby 10, TMech 10, Columbo 9)</i><br />
<font size =3>Kansas City Chiefs 7</font> <i>(Dean 7, Bobby 6, TMech 10, Columbo 5)</i><br />
<font size =3>Denver Broncos 5.5</font> <i>(Dean 3, Bobby 5, TMech 6, Columbo 8 )</i><br />
<font size =3>Oakland Raiders 5.25</font> <i>(Dean 8, Bobby 4, TMech 5, Columbo 4)</i></p>
<p><font size =3><b>NFC East</b></font><br />
<font size =3>Philadelphia Eagles 10.5</font> <i>(Dean 11, Bobby 11, TMech 11, Columbo 9)</i><br />
<font size =3>New York Giants 10.25</font> <i>(Dean 10, Bobby 11, TMech 9, Columbo 11)</i><br />
<font size =3>Dallas Cowboys 9</font> <i>(Dean 8, Bobby 10, TMech 9, Columbo 9)</i><br />
<font size =3>Washington Redskins 5</font> <i>(Dean 5, Bobby 4, TMech 6, Columbo 5)</i></p>
<p><font size =3><b>NFC South</b></font><br />
<font size =3>Atlanta Falcons 11</font> <i>(Dean 10, Bobby 11, TMech 11, Columbo 12)</i><br />
<font size =3>Tampa Bay Buccaneers 10.25</font> <i>(Dean 10, Bobby 10, TMech 11, Columbo 10)</i><br />
<font size =3>New Orleans Saints 8.25</font> <i>(Dean 9, Bobby 8, TMech 7, Columbo 9)</i><br />
<font size =3>Carolina Panthers 3.25</font> <i>(Dean 4, Bobby 2, TMech 4, Columbo 3)</i></p>
<p><font size =3><b>NFC North</b></font><br />
<font size =3>Green Bay Packers 11</font> <i>(Dean 11, Bobby 12, TMech 10, Columbo 11)</i><br />
<font size =3>Detroit Lions 9.25</font> <i>(Dean 9, Bobby 9, TMech 10, Columbo 9)</i><br />
<font size =3>Chicago Bears 8.25</font> <i>(Dean 7, Bobby 9, TMech 8, Columbo 9)</i><br />
<font size =3>Minnesota Vikings 5.25</font> <i>(Dean 4, Bobby 6, TMech 6, Columbo 5)</i></p>
<p><font size =3><b>NFC West</b></font><br />
<font size =3>St. Louis Rams 8.25</font> <i>(Dean 8, Bobby 7, TMech 9, Columbo 9)</i><br />
<font size =3>Arizona Cardinals 7</font> <i>(Dean 8, Bobby 7, TMech 9, Columbo 4)</i><br />
<font size =3>Seattle Seahawks 5.5</font> <i>(Dean 5, Bobby 5, TMech 6, Columbo 6)</i><br />
<font size =3>San Francisco 49ers 4</font> <i>(Dean 5, Bobby 4, TMech 2, Columbo 5)</i></p>
<p><font size =3><b>AFC Playoff Seeds</b></font><br />
<font size =3>1. Patriots   2. Steelers   3. Chargers   4. Colts   5. Ravens   6. Jets</font></p>
<p><font size =3><b>NFC Playoff Seeds</b></font><br />
<font size =3>1. Packers   2. Falcons   3. Eagles   4. Rams   5. Giants   6. Buccaneers</font></p>
<p><font size =3><b>First Round Playoff Games</b></font><br />
<font size =3>New York Jets 21 @ San Diego Chargers 17</font><br />
<font size =3>Baltimore Ravens 31 @ Indianapolis Colts 17</font><br />
<font size =3>Tampa Buccaneers 10 @ Philadelphia Eagles 31</font><br />
<font size =3>New York Giants 24 @ St. Louis Rams 19</font></p>
<p><font size =3><b>Quarterfinals</b></font><br />
<font size =3>New York Jets 20 @ New England Patriots 28</font><br />
<font size =3>Baltimore Ravens 14 @ Pittsburgh Steelers 17</font><br />
<font size =3>New York Giants 20 @ Green Bay Packers 28</font><br />
<font size =3>Philadelphia Eagles 31 @ Atlanta Falcons 35</font></p>
<p><font size =3><b>Conference Championships</b></font><br />
<font size =3>Pittsburgh Steelers 17 @ New England Patriots 24</font><br />
<font size =3>Atlanta Falcons 24 @ Green Bay Packers 21</font></p>
<p><font size =3><b>Super Bowl</b></font><br />
<font size =3>New England Patriots 25 vs Atlanta Falcons 28</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deanbrowski.com/2011/09/08/2011-nfl-season-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Lesson in Bad Judgment</title>
		<link>http://deanbrowski.com/2009/08/27/a-lesson-in-bad-judgement/</link>
		<comments>http://deanbrowski.com/2009/08/27/a-lesson-in-bad-judgement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Better Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Men's BB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisville cardinals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick pitino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of louisville]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanbrowski.com/?p=854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Plaxico Burress&#8217; interview with Jeremy Schapp the other day, the disgraced NFL wide-receiver replied to Schapp&#8217;s question of, &#8220;Why didn&#8217;t you have the gun in the holster?&#8221;, with the beautifully simplistic and succinctly accurate reply of, &#8220;Bad judgment&#8221;. Burress should get 3-4 months knocked of his sentence for coming to realize that. Yesterday I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><p><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/92/Rick_Pitino.jpg/150px-Rick_Pitino.jpg" title="Basketball Coach Rick Pitino" class="alignleft" width="150" height="205" /><br />
In <a href="http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=4422653"  target="_blank">Plaxico Burress&#8217; interview with Jeremy Schapp</a> the other day, the disgraced NFL wide-receiver replied to Schapp&#8217;s question of, &#8220;Why didn&#8217;t you have the gun in the holster?&#8221;, with the beautifully simplistic and succinctly accurate reply of, &#8220;Bad judgment&#8221;.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plaxico_Burress"  target="_blank">Burress</a> should get 3-4 months knocked of his sentence for coming to realize that.</p>
<p>Yesterday I was reminded of Bad Judgment, with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Pitino"  target="_blank">Rick Pitino</a>, head coach at the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Louisville"  target="_blank">University of Louisville</a>, married father of 5.  Coach Pitino went and banged Karen Cunagin Sypher, in a restaurant, with his assistant coach as the lookout, 6 years ago.  Who is she?  Apparently she is someone that is really into Louisville basketball.  This brings to question Pitino decision making on 3 accounts.</p>
<p>1. As the Head Coach of a major basketball program, Pitino is someone that needs to show parents that their kids should play basketball for him, that sponsors should give him money, and that alumni should continue to give buckets of money to him and his team.  Why is he banging broads in public?  To quote <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plaxico_Burress"  target="_blank">Plaxico Burress</a>, &#8220;Bad Judgment&#8221;.   If you were the father of a kid that was being recruited by Pitino, are you letting Coach into your house?  You might think twice, because when you go to refresh everyone&#8217;s lemonade glass, Coach is going to be basketballs deep into your wife.</p>
<p>2. Not inviting his assistant coach to get a piece from the buffet is flat out wrong.  To top it off, he makes the assistant coach stand lookout?!?!  Pitino implicates the assistant coach by making him stand there, and then doesn&#8217;t even let him get in on the action.  That is no way to keep unity on your coaching staff. Bad Judgment.</p>
<p>3. The chick ends up being loony. Go figure! We all know so many &#8216;sane&#8217; girls that have nail-banging sessions on a restaurant table.  I am not complaining, I am just saying.  Watch Fatal Attraction, its a documentary on that type of &#8216;lady&#8217;.  Anyway, Cyphers tries to get money from Pitino, blah blah blah, she gets arrested for extortion and lying to the police.  It sure seems like her arrest is very much deserved.  However, and according to Syphers, during the time she was attempting to extort money, Pitino&#8217;s words to her were along the lines of &#8220;your boy&#8217;s will end up in cement&#8221;, &#8220;you will end up in cement&#8221;, &#8220;your whole family will be in cement&#8221;.  Now, I don&#8217;t know what to think.  Is Syphers just pulling out blatant Italian mob stereo-types, or is Pitino a stereo-typical Italian mobster?  Personally, I believe that Pitino <em>would</em> say something like that.  I also don&#8217;t believe he would actually do, or have done for him, any of those methods of silencing people.  But, I do know that he likes to scream and yell, and he is a little man.  Pitino reacted angrily to the release of the Syphers police interview where she makes these claims.  In a hastily called <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=4424317"  target="_blank">press conference</a> Pitino angrily stated that its all a lie, a fabrication.  He also brought up Sen. Edward Kennedy&#8217;s death and scolded the sportswriters for not covering the death of Kennedy.  Acting like an idiot at the press conference you call to defend yourself against accusations from a crazy person that has zero credibility is Bad Judgment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deanbrowski.com/2009/08/27/a-lesson-in-bad-judgement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s Wagers Made Using the Recognition Heuristic</title>
		<link>http://deanbrowski.com/2008/11/02/todays-wagers-made-using-the-recognition-heuristic-2/</link>
		<comments>http://deanbrowski.com/2008/11/02/todays-wagers-made-using-the-recognition-heuristic-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Better Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wagering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanbrowski.com/?p=580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s Wagers Made Using the Recognition Heuristic or something that attempts to apply this most basic of heuristics. What dooms this experiment is that I am not ignorant enough. When you stop laughing at me I will explain what I mean. The Recognition Heuristic says that while complete knowledge is better than zero knowledge when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><p>
Today&#8217;s Wagers Made Using the Recognition Heuristic or something that attempts to apply this most basic of heuristics.  What dooms this experiment is that I am not ignorant enough.  When you stop laughing at me I will explain what I mean.  The Recognition Heuristic says that while complete knowledge is better than zero knowledge when making a decision; neither is as beneficial as partial knowledge.</p>
<p>I applied the Recognition Heuristic to this week&#8217;s wagers at the Money Line level.  To use this heuristic for with Spreads you first must answer the question &#8216;Who will win?&#8217; before you can answer the question &#8216;Will the team I have decided will win cover the spread?&#8217;.  With Spreads, the ultimate decision is not about the winner of the game.  So this week I made it about the winner of the game.</p>
<p>Now, there isn&#8217;t a lot of value in betting Money Lines in football.  Granted, there are the instances of huge dogs to winning,, but there is a reason the money line is so big, it is massively unlikely.  Conversely, wagering on a huge favorite may &#8216;guarantee&#8217; you a win, but you must risk so much for so littl in return.  However, when parlayed you can create some bang for your buck.  Answer this question.  Do you think you could pick 50% of the winning NFL teams each week?  I honestly don&#8217;t know the answer to that question.  I do remember playing office pools where only winners were picked, and I remember routinely winning 10-14 games.  Perhaps my memory favors me too much, so I am not relying on memory, instead I will begin to chart.  Charting is awareness my friends, and awareness is the key to it all.</p>
<p><a href="http://football.gearlive.com/fourthdown/article/q308-playing-parlays-low-risk-high-reward-slim-chance-11020935/" target="_blank">My NFL wagers this week are:</a><br />
- 7-Team Parlay risking .5% of my <a href="http://deanbrowski.com/glossary" target="_blank">Original Investment (OI)</a> to win 10.17% of my <a href="http://deanbrowski.com/glossary" target="_blank">OI</a>.  All money lines.</p>
<p>- 14-Team Parlay risking .5% of my <a href="http://deanbrowski.com/glossary" target="_blank">Original Investment (OI)</a> to win 452.72% of my <a href="http://deanbrowski.com/glossary" target="_blank">OI</a>. All point spreads.</p>
<p>- 14-Team Parlay risking .5% of my <a href="http://deanbrowski.com/glossary" target="_blank">Original Investment (OI)</a> to win 295.75% of my <a href="http://deanbrowski.com/glossary" target="_blank">OI</a>.  All money lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deanbrowski.com/2008/11/02/todays-wagers-made-using-the-recognition-heuristic-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pr(S) = JPA x HW4</title>
		<link>http://deanbrowski.com/2007/04/10/prs-jpa-x-hw4/</link>
		<comments>http://deanbrowski.com/2007/04/10/prs-jpa-x-hw4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Dean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Better Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wagering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanbrowski.com/wagering-moneyline-picks-odds-pointspread/162/the-dean</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am of the firmest belief that Just Paying Attention (JPA) is sufficient to achieve mediocrity. When JPA is accompanied by Hard Work (HW), Success (S) then becomes more probable. Pr(S) = JPA x HW4 Pr(S) 0 â€“ 20: Donâ€™t forget anything is possible. 20.01 â€“ 45.00: You never know. 45.01 â€“ 55.00: There is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></br><br />
I am of the firmest belief that Just Paying Attention (JPA) is sufficient to achieve mediocrity.  When JPA is accompanied by Hard Work (HW), Success (S) then becomes more probable.  Pr(S) = JPA x HW<sup>4</sup></p>
<p>Pr(S)<br />
0 â€“ 20: Donâ€™t forget anything is possible.<br />
20.01 â€“ 45.00: You never know.<br />
45.01 â€“ 55.00: There is a chance.<br />
55.01 â€“ 65.00: One that got away<br />
65.01 â€“ 80.00: Count on it<br />
80.01 â€“ 89.99: if it doesnâ€™t happen, reevaluate<br />
90.00 +: no reason it shouldnâ€™t happen, if it doesnâ€™t more than 77% of the time, then stop everything!</p>
<p>How do you interpret the above?  How do you define JPA, HW and S?  Is HW to the fourth power adequate?  over-hyped?<br />
What situation or situation type is this being applied to?</p>
<p>I would love to know your ideas and thoughts.  Please post your responses as a Comment to this post so that others can learn from your perspective.  If you are shy and don&#8217;t want your response public, then please <a href="mailto:thedean@deanbrowski.com" target="_blank">Click Here</a> and email your comments to me.</p>
<p>thedean@deanbrowski.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://deanbrowski.com/2007/04/10/prs-jpa-x-hw4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

