
There are good bets and there are bad bets. Both have the potential to win; both have the potential to lose. As I sit here the day after a losing bet, I remain convinced that Ohio St. was not a bad bet. I am not going to talk about how Ohio St. should have won, because they shouldn’t have won, they weren’t the best team out there and they made too many mistakes to even deserve consideration that they might have won the game. Even with that, I remain steadfast that OSU was not a bad bet. Please understand that I fully recognize that LSU was a GOOD bet. But a certain solace can be found by the bettors of Ohio St. that is not afforded to a fan of Ohio St. First off, I only need Ohio St. to cover a 13.5 line, which they almost did. (Had the bet been placed earlier that would have been 15.5 points, but I digress). Secondly, despite all their bad play and mistakes, Ohio St. still had chances to cover and to win, but the whole they dug was too deep and the miscues to crucial.
All that being said, this is the second year in a row that the Buckeyes have been selected to play in the Championship game and the second year in a row that they showed us what they and the Big 10 are really made of; which is that they are weak and do not deserve to be considered among the elites in college football. How can the Big 10 turn this perception? For starters they can play a conference championship game. You may ask what that would do? That even if there were a Big 10 championship, Ohio St. could have won that and still made it to to last night’s game. True. However, when a marginal team has to play more games the likelihood that they will lose a game increases, i.e. the Buckeyes losing to Illinois. Granted LSU had two losses this year, but that speaks to the strength of their conference. So, the first thing the Big 10 needs to do is get that extra game on the schedule.
To help the Big 10 complete this task, I have a proposal. My proposal is for Notre Dame to join the Big 10 making it a 12-team conference, and forming two 6-team divisions. This would also solve the ND as an island scenario that exists now and that really screws teams should the Irish ever field a competitive team again. Each Big 10+2 team would play their division mates for 5-games, 3 of their other division schools and have 4 open slots. I have taken the liberty of forming a Big 10 East and a Big 10 West Division. Here is how it would look:
East Division: Michigan, Michigan St., Notre Dame, Purdue, Ohio St., and Penn St.
West Division: Iowa, Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana, Minnesota, and Northwestern.
With this in place, and with the addition of a Plus-1 scenario, only the Pac 10 needs to get in line and we will be in a much better place.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
[powered by WordPress.]
Powered by Twitter Tools
43 queries. 0.973 seconds
January 8th, 2008 at 9:26 am
I think these divisions are a little one sided! You look at any other conference in football that has two divisions, and they are somewhat split. The divisions above are extremely top heavy. In the western division you have only Wisconsin as a true year to year potential powerhouse. In the east you have 4 if not 5, Michigan, Notre Dame, Ohio St., Penn St., and maybe Michigan St.
I propose the following divisions:
North Division: Michigan, Michigan St, Minnesota, Northwestern, Wisconsin, and Penn St.
South Division: Notre Dame, Purdue, Ohio St., Iowa, Illinois, and Indiana.
Whatcha think?
January 8th, 2008 at 11:09 am
I agree with avidsoccer11. Not sure if that configuration
is how it should go, but the power should be distributed.
I think ND would do well in the Big 10. Plus, the time of
college FB independents is over. Get with the program ND!
January 8th, 2008 at 11:25 am
Oh, and one more thing. Ohio State should be banned
from playing in any national championship game for
at least 5 years.
January 8th, 2008 at 11:40 am
I had split the divisions based on geography. The problem that can arise when you attempt to configure based on ‘power’ is that you are assuming the power will always reside with the same teams.
January 8th, 2008 at 8:02 pm
True dat Sir Dean! Do any of the conferences rotate their sub-conferences?
January 8th, 2008 at 8:12 pm
This Yak thinks it would be great if there were an 8 team playoff system with the major bowls serving as the venues for the playoff games. However, I think it would shorten the regular season. At the same time, it would solidify the prominence of conference football in the NCAA. Can you tell I’m a ND fan who thinks they should join the Big 10?!? HA HA. I would assume teams would go back to playing 11 regular season games, therefore, making it necessary to play most regular-season games within their given conference. I’m sure there would still be a way to play at least 3 games out of conference.